« CFP: 2006 Workshop on Rapid Malcode (WORM06) | Main | Animations form CAIDA »

Death of the IM-Worm?

A short analysis piece from the folks over at VirusList, which is always a good site. This piece looks at the IM worm. I had expected 2006 to be the year of the IM worm, everything pointed that way. Looks like I was wrong. We still see a lot of bots have IM capabilities in them, but we're not seeing many pure IM worms. This article looks at the first half of 2006 and the trends in the IM worm space.
This article examines the evolution of the IM worm since the beginning of 2005. It is written from a European standpoint: this means that it does not include information about certain IM-Worms which did not spread widely in Europe. It also does not cover the topic of malware for certain IM clients such as icq, which are less commonly used in Europe.

Although the first IM-Worm appeared in 2001, this type of malware didn’t become really common until the beginning of 2005. If we take a look at this period, it becomes clear that it’s very important to differentiate between IM Worms which were written with a range of aims.

Source: Death of the IM-Worm?, Roel Schouwenberg, Senior Research Engineer, Kaspersky Lab BNL.

August 20, 2006 in IM worms, new trends | Permalink
Tell others: digg submit | del.icio.us this | Reddit

Comments

Protect and clean your PC.
When searching for an antispyware scanner that will protect and clean your PC it can get a little confusing. There are so many available it’s hard to know which one will work the best. If you’re like me, you’ve probably tried a variety of them all and found they basically all find the same types of bugs. Through my experimenting I’ve found that the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy at (http://www.Search-and-destroy.com) works the best. Search-and-destroy Antispyware cleans and protects my computer just as good as any scanner, it gets rid of those nasty bugs and it does it all for less than many of the others available.

Posted by: Chezy | May 1, 2009 1:21:57 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.